Now, why would the story on Maryland making Wal-Mart pay its share of health costs be billed so low in the Times? It's the number two item in today's FT. Or is this just part of a pattern.

UPDATE: If there is a PR triumph Fox News can claim, it's that "the Times" is "generally perceived" as a "liberal house organ." The chief water carriers for one of the most extravagantly shameful episodes in a long and colorful history. Liberal. It makes me to eat my tuna pita that much faster.